Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig! No, "imprecision for" is not a grammatically correct phrase.
It is possible that you meant "imprecision in," which means a lack of accuracy or exactness. In that case, it can be used in written English to describe a situation where something is not precise or specific. Example: The instructions for assembling the furniture were full of imprecision, making it difficult for me to put the pieces together correctly.
Exact(30)
Despite the lead, there was still a sense Bayern were not entirely comfortable although Madrid were worse in a game of surprising imprecision for two teams of such rich resources.
In practice, many problems are often associated with different types of imprecision, for instance, randomness and uncertainty.
For consumers, the primary limitation of government fuel economy estimates is imprecision for a given individual rather than bias relative to the average individual.
However, considering that service performance evaluations are deeply based on stakeholders' judgments, they can be characterized by possible uncertainties related to incompleteness for partial ignorance, imprecision for subjectivity and even vagueness.
All data layers were generalized to a pixel resolution of ∼10×∼10 km (0.1×0.1°) for analysis, in view of some georeferencing imprecision for occurrence localities.
Intra- and inter-plate imprecision for control samples was <4 and <6 %, respectively.
Similar(30)
We determined imprecisions for each of the Simple Plex assays and evaluated the ability of Simple Plex to detect IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 in serum samples.
We have therefore downgraded for serious imprecision, and for serious inconsistency due to the opposite effects in the two age groups; a finding which is both unexpected and unexplained.
It's time to hold those who perpetuate this confusion accountable for the imprecision of their ideas, and for what amounts to a demand that virtually anything goes, so long as someone "believes" it's okay.
Imprecision estimates for these measurements were larger (10 25%) than those for PM2.5 (≤ 2%), likely because of the lack of true duplicate sampling for these pollutants and also the inherently greater imprecision of passive sampling methods for the gases.
The law's imprecision allowed for competing interpretations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com