impose liability for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "impose liability for" is correct and usable in written English.
You may use it when you want to state that someone or something is responsible for a particular financial obligation or legal responsibility. For example: "The court decided to impose liability for the plaintiff's medical bills on the defendant."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

To require responsible behavior, "dram shop laws" impose liability for serving a drunk person who causes harm to others.

The New York Times

Shouldn't we impose liability for damage caused when a gun owner leaves guns or ammunition unlocked and a family member commits murder or other crimes?

The New York Times

In contrast, IPO-related claims under Sections 11 and 12 of the '33 Act impose liability for innocent or merely negligent misstatements.

Harvard University

(b) The 1934 Act's legislative history also indicates that § 10(b) was addressed to practices involving some element of scienter and cannot be read to impose liability for negligent conduct alone.

Cornell University

While the business judgment rule requires only that informed and disinterested directors who are acting in good faith avoid wasting corporate assets and making irrational decisions, the PBC statute seems to impose liability for decisions that are merely unreasonable.

Columbia University

Petitioner Mutual Pharmaceutical argues that states do not have the right to impose liability for defective designs against generic drug makers because doing so conflicts with the "sameness" requirement of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Policies can foster the trend toward more knowledge work in cities when they impose liabilities for the external effects of the real estate markets through permits, taxes on land, and compensations for harms caused by the real estate development.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

The Court found additional support for its reading in § 271(f)(1), which imposes liability for inducing the completion of a patented method outside the United States.

Harvard University

In certain areas of the law recklessness is considered to be a form of intentional conduct for purposes of imposing liability for some act.

Cornell University

The court is requiring the same actual knowledge on the part of a depository bank before imposing liability for improperly paying on a forged instrument under U.C.C. § 3-405.

Cornell University

Regarding intention or carelessness, the common-law systems have for various reasons been slower than the civil-law systems in imposing liability for inaction.

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "impose liability for", clearly specify the party on whom the liability is being imposed and the action or circumstance that triggers the liability. For example: "The law should impose liability for environmental damage on companies that pollute."

Common error

Avoid using "impose liability for" without clearly defining the scope and conditions of the liability. Ensure that the responsible party and triggering event are explicitly stated to prevent ambiguity and potential legal challenges.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "impose liability for" functions as a verb phrase that describes the act of legally assigning responsibility for a specific action, debt, or damage. Ludwig AI confirms this based on its analysis of numerous examples, including those from legal and academic sources.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Academia

60%

News & Media

20%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

5%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "impose liability for" is a phrase used to legally assign responsibility for damages or wrongdoing. Ludwig AI highlights its frequent occurrence in formal contexts like legal and academic writings. The phrase functions to pinpoint accountability and initiate legal repercussions. While alternatives such as ""assign responsibility for"" exist, they often lack the specific legal weight carried by "impose liability for". Therefore, ensure its precise and clear use, specifying the responsible party and the action triggering liability to avoid ambiguity. Common sources using this phrase are Cornell University, Harvard University and The New York Times.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assign responsibility for

This alternative focuses on designating accountability rather than the legal or financial burden implied by "liability".

hold accountable for

Emphasizes demanding justification or reckoning for actions, differing slightly from the financial or legal sense of "liability".

place the onus on

This alternative highlights the burden of proof or duty, shifting the focus from legal consequences to a general obligation.

deem responsible for

This alternative is more about formally considering someone responsible, rather than necessarily enforcing legal repercussions.

establish accountability for

This implies setting up a system or process to ensure responsibility, rather than the act of assigning liability itself.

attribute culpability to

This alternative concentrates on blame and fault, differing slightly from the broader responsibility covered by "liability".

pin the blame on

Focuses specifically on assigning fault for something negative, diverging from the more neutral concept of liability.

ascribe responsibility to

Similar to assigning responsibility, but can be less formal and carry a sense of subjective judgment.

fix the responsibility on

This alternative suggests a more definite and sometimes forceful assignment of responsibility.

lay the burden on

This phrase underscores the weight or difficulty of the obligation, adding a layer of meaning not present in "liability".

FAQs

What does "impose liability for" mean in legal terms?

In a legal context, "impose liability for" means to legally assign responsibility for damages, debts, or other obligations to a specific individual or entity. This typically results in a requirement to provide compensation or redress the harm caused.

How can I use "impose liability for" in a sentence?

You can use "impose liability for" to indicate that someone is being held legally responsible for something. For example: "The court may "deem responsible for" the accident and "assign responsibility for" the resulting damages."

What are some alternatives to "impose liability for"?

Alternatives include ""assign responsibility for"", "hold accountable for", or ""deem responsible for"". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

What is the difference between ""assign responsibility for"" and "impose liability for"?

"Assign responsibility for" is a broader term indicating a general duty or obligation, while "impose liability for" specifically refers to the legal or financial responsibility arising from a particular action or situation. Liability carries a legal weight that responsibility may not.