Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Acceptable if <3 bCFI (comparative fit index) based on the non-centrality, indicates a good fit if its values get around 1 cRMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) one of the most important goodness of fit indicators.
Similar(58)
Glossiness is far less important than goodness (which is not to say that our home is not attractive: it is, and it has an enviable garden).
How important the goodness of $f$ in $\omega$ is depends on how likely the state is, measured by $p(\omega)$.
E.g., Katz argues that consistency is an important criterion for goodness in mathematics but not in fiction.
Turns out that they still play an important role, thank goodness.
As with all statistical models, it is important to assess goodness of fit.
That is all the more reason she finds it so important to seek out goodness.
Taken altogether, these are important indications supporting the goodness of the ranking we produced in respect to the NSHL, especially if we think that the initial candidate gene list was not a priori filtered by any criterium except that of being all annotated genes located in the susceptibility loci.
An important indicator of the goodness of a meta-model after the training is the coefficient of determination R, defined as (8) R 2 = 1 − ∑ i = 1 N data (y i − y ^ i ) 2 ∑ i = 1 N data (y i − y ¯ i ) 2 where y i are the outputs of the physical or full model, y ¯ i = (1 / N data ) ∑ i = 1 N data y i and y i are the outputs predicted by the meta-model.
The distances of the seismic points from fitted fracture planes (ellipses) are, therefore, important in assessing the goodness-of-fit of the model.
The same buoyancy infuses "Elegies," whose most important ballad, "Infinite Joy," preaches: "Goodness is rewarded/Hope is guaranteed".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com