Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
MEGA7 (Kumar et al. 2016) was also implied to check out the best substitution model for the dataset based on AIC (Akaike 1973) and BIC values.
Similar(59)
He makes insightful points and backs them up with clear and fair analysis and examples, rather than a smug smile and implied invitation to check out his medals.
For θ = h the fact that (l, h | l ) ≽ (l, l | l ) (together with Observation 2 ) implies that we need to check that (l, h | h ) ≽ (h, h | h ) and (l, h | h ) ≽ (l, l | h ) hold for parameters within the stated range and that at least one of these restrictions is violated for parameters outside the range.
It is obvious that convergence in the metric implies w-convergence, and it is easy to check that w-convergence implies Δ-convergence [[6], Proposition 2.5], but it is showed in ([[19], Example 4.7]) that the converse is not valid.
Regarding collision risk, (i.e. mixing two EMRs from two different patients), although it is also related to EMR information and not the on-demand system, it implies that the MP has to check all information, eventually with the help of the patient.
For θ = h Observation 2 and Observation 3 together imply that we need only to check (h, l | h ) ≽ (h, h | h ) ⇔ [ P l − C h − γ max { V − P l − (V − P l ), 0 } ⩾ P h − C h − γ max { V − P l − (V − P h ), 0 } ] ⇔ γ ⩾ 1. □ We derive the bounds for existence of each of the three types of equilibria in turn.
It is easy to check that which implies that is a contraction.
It is easy to check that (3.1) implies inequality (2.1) and the rest follows from Theorem 2.1.
The following condition, similar to the one given in [7], implies (H7) and it is easier to check.
To prove the uniqueness, it is sufficient to check that (x^{1}neq x^{2}) implies (x^{1}(t)neq x^{2}(t)) for every (t in[eta_{k},eta_{k+1}]).
It is easy to check that the condition implies that for all t, where the constant is defined in Definition 2.11 and is from the triangle inequality for.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com