The word 'implicative' is an accepted and usable word in written English.
It means having an implication or suggesting a meaning indirectly. For example, "The sudden silence in the room had an implicative quality that caused everyone to be uneasy."
They are the indirect object of the exclusion that is a form of implicative negation, which includes negative aspects by implication.
Certain tunes are by nature not highly implicative; they are perfect closed units that cannot be easily developed and so are superficially inappropriate for symphonic use.
"For the parts on which the countries have some disagreements, we used indirect and implicative words," South Korea's deputy foreign minister, Lee Soo Hyuck, said Sunday, according to Reuters.
According to Śāntarakṣita, the problem of circularity is thus avoided by a proper understanding of implicative negations: to understand cow one need not understand non-cow, but rather the mere idea of cow.
On the other hand, implicative negations, while denying the existence of one thing, imply the existence of another.
He misses the two types of implicative negations that Śāntarakṣita clearly specifies as included among forms of exclusions.
Emptiness is interpreted in the Geluk tradition as a non-implicative negation (med dgag).
Śāntarakṣita argues that Kumārila misunderstands apoha to always be non-implicative negations.
A non-implicative negation is a negation that does not imply the existence of some other thing.
Thus when Kumārila mistakes all exclusions to be non-implicative negations, he misses this key component to the psychological functions at work and mistakes apoha theory to be counter-intuitive.
As opposed to a negation that implies something else, a non-implicative negation is simply an absence, such as a lack of true existence.
