Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(25)
How conscious were you of trying not to make this story too direct and obvious of an implication — i.e., TV is driving us mad.
Proof The implication (i) → (ii) is obvious.
We prove the implication (i) ⇒ (ii).
Proof We first prove the implication ((i) ⇒ (ii)).
In both versions the implication (i) ⇒ (ii) is obvious.
The implication (i) (vii) is exactly Theorem 3.3.
Similar(35)
The implications (i) (ii) and (ii) (iii) follow immediately from Theorems 3.4 and 3.5 and the definition of recession cone.
rabbits is really just equivalent to its empirical implications, i.e., to the proposition that there are 800 lb.
By limiting incommensurability to fundamental theories, Feyerabend meant those that have ontological implications; i.e., those that have implications about the very nature of reality.
Therefore, this example also shows that the implications ((i) ⇒ (iv)) of Theorem 2.3 and ((i) ⇒ (iv)) of Theorem 2.6 are independent of results obtained in [17 19].
Quantifying the major ion composition of stream waters also has broad implications, i.e., water type, hydrogeology characteristics, weathering processes and rainfall chemistry.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com