Sentence examples for implementation of this directive from inspiring English sources

Nonetheless, I am deeply concerned about where implementation of this directive could lead.

The Conservative party resisted the implementation of this directive, and a future rightwing Tory government led by Boris Johnson, Michael Gove and Iain Duncan Smith would cast it on to the bonfire, along with other workers' rights – so allowing the wholesale undercutting of wages.

Without prejudice to Member States' civil liability regimes, Member States shall provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties in respect of statutory auditors and audit firms, where statutory audits are not carried out in conformity with the provisions adopted in the implementation of this Directive (art. 30.2 chap. VII, Directive 2006/43/EC).

More specifically, it states that: Without prejudice to Member States' civil liability regimes, Member States shall provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties in respect of statutory auditors and audit firms, where statutory audits are not carried out in conformity with the provisions adopted in the implementation of this Directive (art. 30.2 chap. VII, Directive 2006/43/EC).

So I am very concerned about the implementation of this directive within Member States.

The first report on the implementation of this directive was published in May 2014 and identified several shortcomings.

When the European court of justice struck down the data retention directive this rendered the UK's implementation of the directive unlawful.

The obvious course is to delay implementation of the directive until major players outside the EU are willing to join in imposing a levy.

This inhomogeneous panorama can be explained with a pattern of institutional structures that have so far affected the implementation of the Directive.

While the Regulation is self-executing, implementation of the Directive demands the adoption of national legislative and administrative measures in each Member State.

The original case was directed against the UK Secretary of State for Transport "for judicial review in relation to the implementation" of the Directive, without further elaboration.