Sentence examples for implementation of land use from inspiring English sources

The mechanism is the implementation of land use planning at city level in order to cope up with the increasing urban expansion.

Land administration systems, and particularly their core cadastral components, are an important infrastructure which facilitates the implementation of land use policies.

The results show that the implementation of land use planning has a certain effect in curbing the expansion of construction land, and that the incremental amount of construction land decreases by 107,449 ha due to the planning implementation.

This information on LULC changes and possibilities for their optimal use is essential for the selection, planning and implementation of land use schemes to meet the increasing demands for basic human needs and welfare.

It is necessary investment in drainage, sanitation and waste removal services, and improved implementation of land use and urban planning laws (horizontal and vertical cross-scale) to integrate the risk management process.

When applied to the design and implementation of land use plans, this type of information can improve the acceptability of conservation actions, enhance environmental stewardship, and minimise land use conflict through taking stock of the values and attitudes (precursors to behaviour) that are relevant to proposed land use change and conservation action.

In addition, the implementation effect of land use planning presented significant differences among cities, which shows that there is a weaker effect in megacities and large cities than in medium-small cities. Besides, the implementation effect of land use planning also shows temporal differences: its effect is better in 2007 2009 than in 2010 2012.

This paper examines the attempts that planners have made to discipline downtown development through the articulation and implementation of land-use regulation.

These include differences in the implementation of land-use data in the terrestrial ecosystem component among models, and whether the model considers emissions and uptake caused by shifting cultivation, wood harvesting, forest degradation, crop harvesting, peat fires, and others.

Similar to the findings globally summarised by Liu et al. [Science 317 (2007) 1513], time lags between the implementation of land-use policies and the appearance of socio-ecological consequences are observed in our case.

However, despite the growing emphasis on integrated catchment-scale implementation of land-use mitigation measures, the baseline landscape-scale evaluation of the spatial variability of key soil nutrients remains scarce.