Ai Feedback
Exact(9)
Without the selective feature, DF gives implementation losses of up to 20 dB.
Some implementation losses may exist as a result of residual errors in the replicas of the estimated synchronization parameters.
Without the selective feature, the performance is very poor with implementation losses of up to 20 dB.
where in [bit/s/Hz] is the Shannon bound, is the attenuation factor representing implementation losses, and and are the minimum and maximum SINRs supported by the available modulation and coding schemes.
where is the thermal noise spectral density in dBm/Hz units, is the effective bandwidth, is the noise figure in dB and models the implementation losses in dB units.
We conclude that the performability of ideal ASEEM (without implementation losses) maximizes with an improvement of 132% over the compared static modes (performance and reliability) at an MTTR of 19.8 h and 91% of the time in the performance mode for the space-grade FPGA.
Similar(51)
Finally, in the experiments, we compare the performance of the implemented schemes in terms of outage probability, complexity and a novel "implementation loss" measure.
where is the "implementation loss".
We also analysed the implementation loss of our implementations.
Doing so DF and DSTC have an implementation loss of around 5 dB, while CMRC, AF, and SR has an implementation loss of around 2.5 dB.
In selection relaying (without antenna diversity) the maximum implementation loss is 10 dB.
Related(14)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com