Sentence examples for implementation in comparison from inspiring English sources

The authors have verified the accuracy of the FFT implementation, in comparison with the recursive implementation, enhancing the computational performance.

Numerical results show good performance and scaling properties of our implementation in comparison with other parallel packages.

In this sense, the presented study is more computationally attractive and thus feasible in practical implementation in comparison with other existing results.

The decoding complexity of COSTBC, however, is significantly less (linear) than the strategies of [23, 24] and makes COSTBCs amenable for practical implementation in comparison to [23, 24], where STBCs with high decoding complexity are used.

There was a greater likelihood of being PBSP-unaware among those with lower education after season 1 implementation in comparison to those with higher education (OR=1.60, 95%CI: 1.18, 2.19).

Furthermore, this type of controller (of low order) is frequently used for industrial purposes due to its simplicity and straightforward implementation in comparison with the high order controllers that H∞ technique yields.

The study had two main objectives: (1) measure and compare indicators of iCCM implementation strength in intervention areas and routine CCM implementation strength in comparison areas and (2) assess the quality of iCCM services provided to sick children in intervention areas.

This is a suitable option for enhancing precision for pedestrian navigation in buildings with a highly reduced implementation costs in comparison with previous solutions.

For large instances, the algorithmic advantages from problem knowledge in the genetic algorithms seem to dominate any implementation issues in comparison to a commercially developed and optimized general-purpose software.

In Cardiff rates of hospital admissions fell from seven a month per 100 000 population in the 36 months before implementation of the programme to five a month per 100 000 population in the 36 months after implementation, but increased in comparison cities from five to eight a month per 100 000 population.

Moreover, although our implementation was rudimentary in comparison with CPLEX 6.0, a commercial solver, the tested methods were competitive (sometimes favorable) in attaining a final (though only near optimal) solution for the set of large-scale low-density problems.