The aim is to prove formally, before implementation, their correctness w.r.t. the required properties such as achieving safely the expected services (soundness property).
The activities of specification, implementation and correctness raise a collection of overlapping conceptual questions and problems (B. C. Smith 1985; Turner 2011; Franssen et al. 2010).
In practice, this leads to very complex implementations whose correctness is hard to verify and that have weak progress guarantees [16].
Therefore, in this article, we measure the status of several DNSSEC-enabled operational zones measuring both the level of DNSSEC implementation and the correctness of DNSSEC configuration.
The main difference between our approach and related works is that we were able to join two important aspects: 1) process scalability achieved through relational database implementation, and 2) correctness of processes using process algebra.
Evaluation criteria included correct implementation of the interview questions, correctness of the patient information as well as interactional factors.
These include specification, implementation, semantics, programs, programming, correctness, abstraction and computation.
The first three examples are smaller mechanisms and are used to verify the correctness of implementation of GraTeLPy, since their critical fragments have already been found elsewhere.
We show correctness of this implementation and provide comparative results between a regular implementation and our new one on both FPGA and ASIC.
