implement to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'implement to' is not correct.
The correct phrase would be 'implement'. For example: The company implemented a new training program.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

All in all, a handy implement to keep about the house.

The New Yorker

And are there affordable and effective measures that home owners can implement to -prevent- localised flooding?

The Guardian

What controls would editors and reporters need to implement to remain independent from corporate interests?

The New York Times

Accenture identified over 30 innovations that Vodafone could implement to benefit mobile users, society and itself.

The Guardian

But there are measures the industry could implement to make a dangerous sport less so.

The New York Times - Sports

"There are actions that the National Grid can implement to better protect the power grid.

The Guardian

What important changes does the government need to implement to improve the country's business climate?

The New York Times

Each contestant must choose a garden implement to interact with during the song.

The Guardian - Music

"We have formed an action plan and a roadmap which we will implement to achieve this," he said.

The Guardian

-What types of advertising will your business implement to reach those to whom you are trying to reach?

The New York Times

The plan presents 27 such solutions that companies, consumers, governments and nonprofits can implement to cut down on food waste.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "implement to". The correct and concise form is "implement", followed directly by the object of the verb. For example, instead of "implement to improve", use "implement improvements".

Common error

A common mistake is adding "to" after "implement". This is grammatically incorrect. Remember that "implement" is a transitive verb, meaning it directly takes an object. You don't need a preposition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "implement to" functions incorrectly as an infinitive phrase, where "implement" should directly take an object without the preposition "to". Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

26%

Wiki

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

14%

Social Media

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "implement to" is frequently encountered, as confirmed by Ludwig, but it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is simply "implement", followed directly by the object of the verb. This error appears across various sources, including news media, scientific publications, and wikis. While the intention is usually clear, the incorrect grammar detracts from the writing's credibility. Remember to use "implement" directly to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. For instance, use "implement changes" instead of "implement to changes".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

implement

This is the correct verb form without the unnecessary preposition.

put into action

This alternative uses a different structure to convey the same meaning.

put in place

Suggests establishing or setting something up to be used.

carry out

This option implies a process of performing or executing something.

execute

This choice suggests a more formal and precise approach to implementation.

apply

This suggests using a method or plan in a particular situation.

take action

This suggests initiating steps to achieve a goal.

enforce

This focuses on making sure a rule or law is followed.

effectuate

This suggests bringing something about or making it happen.

realize

This implies making something concrete or actual.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "implement" in a sentence?

The correct way to use "implement" is as a transitive verb, directly followed by the object. For example, "The company will "implement" a new policy" is correct, while "The company will implement to a new policy" is incorrect.

Why is "implement to" considered grammatically incorrect?

"Implement" is a transitive verb, which means it takes a direct object without needing a preposition like "to". Adding "to" creates an unnecessary and grammatically incorrect construction.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "implement to"?

Instead of "implement to", you can use simpler and grammatically correct alternatives such as "implement", "put into action", or "carry out".

Is there a difference in meaning between "implement" and "implement to"?

While the intended meaning might be understood, "implement to" is grammatically incorrect. The verb "implement" itself conveys the meaning of putting a plan or system into effect, making "to" redundant and incorrect.