implement face to face

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "implement face to face" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to describe conducting a meeting or interaction in person, but the wording is awkward and unclear. Example: "We need to implement face-to-face meetings to improve communication within the team."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

This service bundles together a number of pre-configured WebRTC-based tools that allow developers to quickly implement face-to-face video chats for customer service applications.

TechCrunch

The study itself was successful but [ 22] advanced engineering "m-health" concepts, involving the extension of automated voice communication to mothers, was found to be less effective than simple-to-implement face-to-face voice communication between mothers and health workers [ 23, 24].

BMC Health Services Research

Finally, face to face.

The New York Times

Face to face.

Independent

Frida Kahlo: face to face.

Columbia University

They met face to face again last May.

The New York Times - Arts

"She came face to face with him.

The New York Times

Sometimes the fighting was face to face".

The New Yorker

"It was face to face," Holley said.

The New Yorker

"You're brought face to face with yourself".

Independent

Congregations meet regularly face to face.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, specify the type of interaction. Instead of "implement face to face", consider "conduct face-to-face interviews" or "arrange face-to-face meetings" for better context.

Common error

Avoid using "implement" with physical interactions. "Implement" typically applies to processes, systems, or plans. For direct human interaction, use verbs like "conduct", "arrange", or "hold" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "implement face to face" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates it deviates from standard English usage. The intended function, to describe enacting something via in-person interaction, is obscured by the improper verb choice.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "implement face to face" is grammatically incorrect according to Ludwig AI's analysis. It aims to express the execution of something through in-person interaction but fails due to improper verb usage. While the intention might be understood, it's crucial to use more precise and grammatically sound alternatives like "conduct face-to-face meetings" or "arrange personal interviews". This ensures clarity and maintains professionalism in both formal and informal communication. By avoiding this phrase, you enhance the credibility and effectiveness of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conduct in-person meetings

Replaces "implement" with "conduct" and rephrases "face to face" as "in-person", emphasizing the action of holding meetings.

enforce direct interaction

Uses "enforce" to suggest a requirement for "direct interaction", highlighting the mandatory aspect of personal engagement.

establish personal contact

Focuses on creating "personal contact" rather than the broader concept of implementing an activity.

apply interpersonal methods

Replaces the specific "face to face" with a broader "interpersonal methods", indicating a more general approach to human interaction.

undertake personal interviews

Changes the context to a more specific task of "personal interviews", emphasizing a structured conversation.

execute in-person strategies

Uses "execute" in place of "implement" suggesting an activity that is planned and then carried out directly with people.

institute direct communication

Focuses on establishing "direct communication" as a policy or method to be followed.

arrange face-to-face discussions

Specifies "face-to-face discussions", emphasizing dialogue and conversation over general interaction.

put direct engagement into practice

Highlights turning 'direct engagement' to action rather than implementing interaction in general.

introduce direct personal techniques

Replaces implement with introduce and focuses on techniques instead of a broad approach. Specifies direct personal techniques for increased emphasis

FAQs

What is a grammatically correct way to express "implement face to face"?

Instead of "implement face to face", use phrases like "conduct face-to-face meetings", "hold face-to-face interviews", or "arrange face-to-face discussions" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

What verbs can I use instead of "implement" when referring to face-to-face interactions?

Consider using verbs such as "conduct", "arrange", "hold", or "organize" to describe face-to-face interactions. For example, instead of saying "implement face to face", you might say "conduct face-to-face meetings".

Is "implement face to face" considered formal or informal language?

The phrase "implement face to face" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal contexts. Opt for more precise and grammatically sound alternatives.

What's the difference between "implement a strategy" and "conduct a face-to-face meeting"?

"Implement a strategy" refers to putting a plan or method into effect, while "conduct a face-to-face meeting" refers to organizing and carrying out an in-person interaction. "Implement" is for abstract plans, and "conduct" is for specific activities.