ISQ values were compared according to gender, age, implantation site, and implant size within the MBB group.
In addition, ISQ values were analyzed within the MBB group according to sex, age, implantation site, and implant size, using OsstellTM Mentor (Osstell®, Göteborg, Sweden).
So the second time, Jane Z., who preferred to not have her last name mentioned, was thrilled that she could choose her implant size during surgery.
The treatment area and the implant size used in this study are shown in Table 1.
Tables 2 and 3 present the distribution of implant site and implant size, respectively.
used standard intra-operative techniques to determine the appropriate implant size.
The influence of the surgical technique is smaller than that of implant size and shape.
For these reasons, only adjusting the implant size does not solve the problem – the shape must be taken into account.
The distal humeral articular segments, the radial head and coronoid were used as templates for choosing the correct implant size.
Any differences in the remodeling pattern were compared according to age, body mass index, and implant size.
An intriguing observation noted by registry data and clinical studies is an inverse relationship between implant size and revision rate.
