Ai Feedback
The phrase "imperfect of" is not a grammatically correct phrase on its own.
The word "of" is a preposition and requires an object to complete the phrase. It is also not a commonly used phrase in written English. You can use "imperfect" as an adjective to describe a noun. For example, "Her imperfect singing voice was endearing to her audience." or "The painting had an imperfect brushstroke that added character to the piece." It is also possible to use "imperfect" as a noun, meaning something that is not perfect or has flaws. For example, "The perfectionist could not accept anything less than perfection and struggled with embracing imperfections." However, "of" is not used in conjunction with "imperfect" in this context. If you are trying to indicate possession, you could say "His imperfections" or "The imperfections of the system."
Exact(23)
The health reform legislation in Congress is imperfect, of course.
"But it's imperfect, of course it is, and everybody knows that it is," he said.
But democracy, as is well known, is only the least imperfect of political systems.
In English, by contrast, writing is often thought of as a reflection, albeit imperfect, of speech.
Second-wave, to be sure, and imperfect, of course, but chilling and complicated and uncondescending to its audience.
The performances are imperfect (of the hollow drum sound on "Lover of Love," Vega writes, "Call it compressed leakage through a piano lid"), floppy, weird, and humane.
Similar(36)
Their genomes are typically depleted of CG dinucleotides because of imperfect repair of deaminated methylcytosines.
I examined these photos and savored each one, even the imperfect, out-of-focus ones.
A comparison of genome sizes and mean lengths of imperfect STRs of all 12 genomes is shown in Figure 1b.
The size of the deviation from actual informal payment represents the effect of imperfect information of medical staff and patients.
Because of his imperfect understanding of the aging of pigment, Prud'hon's paintings have darkened badly.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com