Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
I argue that the evaluation process in each case exemplifies an infringement of Immanuel Kant's concept of a "categorical imperative" applied to socially evolved "rights issues" using the axiom of noncontradiction.
Similar(59)
Building on the categorical imperative of the German philosopher Immanuel Kant that persons must always be treated as ends in themselves rather than as means philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel suggested that the same imperative applies to a person's property.
The same constitutional imperative applies to the provincial courts: Reference re Remuneration of Judges of the Provincial Court of Prince Edward Island, 3 S.C.R. 3 (the "Provincial Court Judges Reference").
This hypothetical imperative applies to you only if you desire coffee and choose to gratify that desire.
The condition under which a hypothetical imperative applies to us, then, is that we will some end.
The wide-scope interpretation posits a disjunctive requirement (that one either not will the end or will the means) that, like Kant's categorical imperative, applies to every rational agent, regardless of the particular ends she wills.
The same imperative applies to the international community.
This imperative applies to all federal agencies, but especially to those obscure front-line operations--including FEMA, the Defense Contract Management Agency, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and other outfits currently on the skids and too long treated as backwaters.
And exactly the same imperatives apply to the newsgathering that Ofcom and Ipso regulate.
So while hypothetical imperatives apply to me only on the condition that I have and set the goal of satisfying the desires that they tell me how to satisfy, categorical imperatives apply to me no matter what my goals and desires may be.
Any imperative that applied to us because we will our own happiness would thus be an assertoric imperative.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com