Sentence examples for impartial judgment of from inspiring English sources

In Godwin's mind, the fact that one individual has a greater claim to rescue than the other is not only not in conflict with impartiality, but indeed is implied by impartiality, for it is based on the (alleged) fact that an impartial judgment of their worth attributes more to one than to the other.

But juries are a different matter – they are held to embody the distilled fairness and impartial judgment of all of us.

The Constitution protects property owners not by giving them license to engage the police in a debate over the basis for the warrant, but by interposing, ex ante, the "deliberate, impartial judgment of a judicial officer … between the citizen and the police," Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 481 482, 83 S.Ct.

9 The arrest warrant procedure serves to insure that the deliberate, impartial judgment of a judicial officer will be interposed between the citizen and the police, to assess the weight and credibility of the information which the complaining officer adduces as probable cause.

This month marks the 70-year anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials, which gave an impartial judgment of the Nazi's war crimes during World War II.

Referees, experts in a particular field, are crucial to the success of the review system by providing impartial judgment on emerging research of their peers and colleagues [3] [6].

Mr. Wen told Mr. Lee that China would make an "impartial judgment" on who was responsible for the sinking, said Mr. Lee's spokesman, Lee Dong-kwan.

"Offering the readers an advocate, someone who has the experience, the skills and the license to study our work and pass impartial judgments on it, is a demonstration of our commitment to those standards".

One corporate governance expert, Charles M. Elson, professor of corporate governance at the University of Delaware, questioned whether Mr. Iger would be able to render impartial judgments on Apple's strategy that could affect Disney.

(Below we consider a further reason behind Rawls's rejection of the state of nature: it does not adequately allow for impartial judgment and the equality of persons).

Others caution against abandonment of standards of disinterested, impartial judgment altogether, arguing that such a move relinquishes the important normativity of aesthetic evaluations (Eaton 2008, 2013b).