"impartial decision" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It refers to a decision that is unbiased and fair, without favoring one side over the other. Example: The judge made an impartial decision based on the evidence presented in court.
Right and left continue to debate the 2000 election because even the Supreme Court proved itself incapable of making an impartial decision.
We hope that the agency will remember that its responsibility is to reach an impartial decision based on the "best science" — something it forgot the first time around.
Under the New York death penalty statute, interviews are required to determine whether any juror has "the state of mind that is likely to preclude the juror from rendering an impartial decision".
And the legal concept I'm espousing (ph) is that under the law of war, Article 5 specifically of the Geneva Convention, requires the detaining authority to allow an impartial decision maker to determine the question of status.
FROM THE DISSENT By Justice Souter Kim's claim is a limited one: not that the Government may not detain LPRs to ensure their appearance at removal hearings, but that due process under the Fifth Amendment conditions a potentially lengthy detention on a hearing and an impartial decision maker's finding that detention is necessary to a governmental purpose.
But his presidency raised questions about whether the agency would be able to make an impartial decision given the involvement of two billionaire New York City developers who were among the four final bidders and who have ties with the president.
With authoritative leadership Hasemann [ 45] meant leaders who were delegating and telling, related to the followers both flexibly and decisively and made firm and impartial decisions.
What impresses the public in these matters is transparent and impartial decision-making based on wide consultation.
"The findings in this case," Microsoft stated, "are not the product of even one level of impartial decision-making".
The United States Supreme Court held, 5 to 4, that due process was violated because of the lack of an impartial decision-maker.
Nevertheless, restoring trust in the court's impartial decision-making remains vital for justices embarking on a new season of tough calls.
