Specifically, we assess the impact of these methods on the computational complexity of the single particle models.
The authors conclude that the cumulative impact of these methods, especially over time, constitutes cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment and, in some cases, rises to the level of torture.
To compare the measurement variability for coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements using mineral mass compared with a modified Agatston score (AS) or volume score (VS) with multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanning, and to estimate the potential impact of these methods on the design of CAC progression studies.
Because the potential impact of these methods on the biology of mosquitoes had not been measured, we carried out a series of trials that compared heart contraction dynamics following different manipulations.
The impact of these methods on therapeutic decisions and outcome has not yet been studied.
14 20 We now need to compare the impact of these methods on the statistical significance of pooled effect estimates and on the associated quality of evidence.
Many studies have focused on comparisons among different techniques and the impact of these methods on the properties of the isolated ASCs [ 35].
The combined impact of these methods are considerable on compression ratios and the primary reason for Gap5 databases being considerably smaller than BAM files.
We have investigated the impact of these methods on the estimation of parameters, type I error of covariate inclusion (i.e., the probability of falsely demonstrating a significant covariate relationship), and the feasibility of implementing the methods.
The impact of these methods was recognized with the awarding of the 2010 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Richard Heck, Ei-ichi Negishi, and Akira Suzuki for their seminal contributions to the development of Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling.
