Sentence examples for impact reviewer from inspiring English sources

This study was designed to extend existing research on online review helpfulness by looking at not just the quantitative factors (such as word count), but also qualitative aspects of reviewers (including reviewer experience, reviewer impact, reviewer cumulative helpfulness).

Although other approaches to variance analysis are possible, the investigators considered three main sources of variance that impact reviewer agreement to be: 1) abstract effect; 2) reviewer effect; and 3) abstract-reviewer effect[ 10].

In addition to the external conditions that can impact reviews, the reviewers themselves don't necessarily have the same background and deep knowledge of a subfield as the authors, and yet all they have to evaluate the work on is what's written on the page.

Jindal et al. [8] also studied the impact of reviewer centric features on review spam detection.

However, there have been relatively few studies dedicated to this topic, and even these do not show a major impact of reviewer characteristics on publication decisions.

Whether or not this was a real difference or reflected greater propensity to record these comorbidities, the impact on reviewers is likely to mean they were less likely to judge a death avoidable.

The tendency for some reviewers to consistently score higher (or lower) than others, the impact on overall reviewer agreement, and statistical methods to detect bias (and enhance overall fairness of reviews), need to be further investigated.

As a result, characteristics of reviewers and review messages have a varying degree of impact on review helpfulness.

Star Trek: Nemesis made no impact on this reviewer's cranium, possibly because he's never seen an entire episode of Star Trek.

They looked at the effects of peer review on various criteria, including methodological soundness, completeness and accuracy.Although journal editors go to great pains to ensure that authors do not know the identity of their reviewers, or vice versa, the researchers found that this laborious and expensive process had little impact on the reviewers' appraisals of quality of research.

To describe the impact of peer reviewers on spin in reports of nonrandomized studies assessing a therapeutic intervention.