immediate with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "immediate with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear in what context it is intended to be used, as "immediate" typically requires a direct object or a preposition to clarify its relationship with other words. Example: "I need an immediate response from you."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Sport

Business

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Opposition was immediate, with Mr. Barenboim even threatening to resign.

The New York Times - Arts

As for power, it is immediate, with no turbo lag.

The New York Times

Improvement was immediate with the Atlético Madrid forward closer to Olivier Giroud.

The Guardian - Sport

The dividend was almost immediate, with Saha putting the Toffees ahead in the fourth minute.

The Guardian - Sport

The results were immediate, with "more or less zero infection" rates last year.

The Guardian

The backlash was immediate, with Egyptians criticizing the decision and mocking the government on social media.

The Washington Post

But respite is almost immediate, with an engrossing week of Classic trials starting in Ireland tomorrow.

Independent

The Brazilian reaction was sharp and immediate, with the government and the opposition demonstrating a rare unity.

The New York Times

The accolades from around the sports world were immediate, with some even suggesting that Dunfee be named flag-bearer.

The Guardian - Sport

But the fallout was immediate, with some Labour MPs suggesting he should resign and the opposition frontbench demanding he come to parliament to explain himself.

The Guardian

They did just that and the dividends were almost immediate, with Jamie Ward firing in a well-taken half-volley in the ninth minute.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using more grammatically sound alternatives like "immediately followed by" or "immediate, with" to improve clarity and correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "immediate with" as a direct substitute for conjunctions like "and" or "because". It often leads to grammatically incorrect sentences. Instead, rephrase to use a more standard construction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "immediate with" functions as a prepositional modifier, attempting to link an adjective of time to a related element. However, Ludwig AI indicates that its usage often deviates from standard grammatical conventions. The phrase's role is to establish a sense of temporal proximity or consequence, but its grammatical structure is frequently disputed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

29%

Sport

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

6%

Wiki

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "immediate with" is used to convey a sense of temporal proximity and direct association. However, as indicated by Ludwig AI, its grammatical correctness is questionable. Although the phrase appears frequently in various contexts, including news, science, and sports, writers should exercise caution and consider more grammatically sound alternatives like "immediately followed by" or rephrasing to use standard English constructions. While its intention is clear, the lack of grammatical precision detracts from its effectiveness in formal communication. Therefore, careful consideration and context-dependent judgment are crucial when using or interpreting this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

instant with

Shortens the phrase while retaining the sense of immediacy, though it remains grammatically questionable.

promptly accompanied by

Replaces "immediate" with "promptly", suggesting a swift reaction.

instantly together with

Emphasizes the instantaneous and simultaneous nature.

directly followed by

Highlights the sequential aspect with a clear cause-and-effect relationship.

swiftly succeeded by

Indicates a quick transition from one event to another.

right away accompanied by

Replaces "immediate" with a more colloquial "right away".

instantaneously accompanied by

Emphasizes the simultaneous occurrence but is more formal and less common.

occurring immediately alongside

Highlights the parallel occurrence but is more verbose.

at once joined by

Suggests a simultaneous joining or addition.

coincident with

Highlights that two events occur at the same time.

FAQs

Is "immediate with" grammatically correct?

No, "immediate with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The word "immediate" typically requires a direct object or a prepositional phrase to clarify its relationship to other words in the sentence. Consider using phrases like "immediately followed by" or "immediate effect" instead.

What are some alternatives to "immediate with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "immediately followed by", "instant with", "promptly with", or "swiftly followed by". The best choice depends on the specific meaning you want to convey.

How can I use "immediate" correctly in a sentence?

Use "immediate" with a noun it modifies, such as "immediate action" or "immediate response". Alternatively, use it with a preposition like "in" (in the immediate aftermath) or "to" (immediate threat to safety).

What's the difference between "immediate with" and "immediately followed by"?

"Immediate with" is grammatically questionable, while "immediately followed by" is a correct and clear way to indicate that something happens directly after something else. For example, "The announcement was immediately followed by a press conference" is a proper usage.