Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
Within the networks, coherence varied as a function of imitation accuracy, F 1, 12) = 4.8, p = .049, showing larger coherence for subjects with higher imitation accuracy.
Individual differences in fronto-parietal coherence were furthermore found to predict imitation accuracy.
Furthermore, imitation accuracy significantly interacted with Period and Repetition, F 3, 36) = 4.0, p = .026.026
To further specify how coherence in the fronto-parietal networks is supporting imitation accuracy over time, a series of correlation analyses were performed between imitation accuracy and each consecutive observation and pause.
In none of the analyses of power data did we find any effect of or interaction with imitation accuracy.
An interesting dissociation is that imitation accuracy correlated with fronto-parietal coherence, but not with mu and alpha power.
Similar(45)
Thus, contrary to Wolff, Mendelssohn does not suppose that what we enjoy in imitation is accuracy of representation taken to the point of illusion, but rather the room for the experience of our own mental activity that the knowledge that the depicted object is only being imitated allows.
Fronto-parietal coherence predicted the accuracy of subsequent imitation, indicating a central role for these structures in imitation learning.
We assessed comprehension by measuring accuracy in an elicited imitation task (Experiment 1), and responses in a looking-preference comprehension task (Experiments 2 4).
This suggests that the strength of the functional coupling between parietal and frontal parts of the network for imitation learning is decisive for the accuracy of newly acquired action sequences.
The accuracies also fluctuated little across group size n and total probability of imitation p+q (in both cases, the range of predicted accuracies in decisions were at most 0.15 for the aggregated rule, and at most 0.02 for the expert rule).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com