Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
The images were evaluated by two evaluators according to previously described criteria.
In the qualitative evaluation, the fused images were evaluated visually.
Changes between the 2006 and 2011 classified images were evaluated using change statistics and change visualization techniques.
The obtained images were evaluated by measuring contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs).
These images were evaluated visually and quantitatively.
The thermographic images were evaluated with the dedicated software IRTCronista.
Images were evaluated using a 17-segment model to derive the SRS and additional nuclear variables.
Axial CT and VB images were evaluated for surface irregularity and the presence, length, and severity of stenosis.
Images were evaluated by a single reader who did not know whether the images were acquired separately or simultaneously.
Successful realignment and distortion of the images were evaluated using visual inspection.
MRI images were evaluated for contrast agent enhancement of the tumor.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com