Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
For Instagram to remove those images is over the effing top -- I've seen blood before, I've definitely seen it on Instagram.
Similar(59)
Additionally, HE gave the worst performance as the resulting images were over-enhanced, had unrealistic contrast, and were affected by visual flaws.
These tests demonstrate its reliability in correctly identifying the segmented regions even when the image is over-segmented.
People who say they post things on Facebook or Twitter to improve their image are over 4.5 times more likely than other people to "always" feel stressed.
The AS image was over-sampled compared to the two original images: the number of trials of the AS image ranged from 19 to 51 trials, mean ± SD 34 ± 7 trials.
Moreover the extraction rates of "maxQ-JPEG75" and "maxQ-JPEG50" for all test images were over 95%, where the errors could be recovered by using error correcting codes.
This image is over 300,000 pixels wide.
In which case, if an erect penis image is over 20 years old it's "art", and therefore OK to be seen by kids.
However, the whole image is over smoothed, the output image looks unnatural, and part texture information is lost.
Besides, the quality of the watermarked image is satisfactory in terms of imperceptibility as the PSNR per watermarked image is over 42 dB.
Besides, the quality of the watermarked image is satisfactory in term of perceptibility (the PSNR per watermarked image is over 35 dB).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com