For the illustration, fluxes were generated with a mix of power-law and Hill functions, namely (4) v 1 = 1.5 X 3 − 6 v 2 = 2.4 X 1 0.8 v 3 = V max X 2 3 K M 3 + X 2 3, v 4 = 2 X 3 0.75 where V max = 5 and K M = 2.
For illustration, activation maps were generated with a global threshold set at P = 0.001 uncorrected at a whole brain level, and with a cluster extent (kE) threshold set at 10 voxels.
All illustrations in this survey were generated with DIAMOND.
Illustrations of LC-MS/MS data were generated using Microsoft Office Suite.
Forest plots illustrating the mean difference and 95%% CI were generated for graphic illustration.
The illustrations of the three-dimensional structures were generated with SWISS-PDB viewer [Guex and Peitsch, 1997] and rendered with Persistence of Vision Raytracer (Version 3.6).
This figure is merely intended as an illustration of how predictions of CrCL were generated and specifically not as a goodness-of-fit plot.
For illustration, we suppose that the data were generated from a linear structural equation model with interactions (and, for simplicity, no confounders), that is, a model implying the following conditional expectations:, and.
