Sentence examples for illustrates that the difference from inspiring English sources

Figure 8 illustrates that the difference between fuzzy model and original system with ( Delta a = - 0.1, Delta b = - 0.5 ; )( Delta a = - 0.1, Delta b = 0.5; )( Delta a = 0.1,Delta b = - 0.5; ) and ( Delta a = 0.1, Delta b = 0.5 ) tends to zero for mentioned values of Δa and Δb, i.e. the fuzzy model can represent the original system.

It illustrates that the difference between a poorly organised practice and a well-organised practice was associated with smaller and larger impact on clinical performance.

Figure 2 illustrates that the difference in ICU LOS comparing patients with hypoglycemia and patients without hypoglycemia is found across different ranges of severity of illness, reflected by admission APACHE II score.

Figure 1A summarizes the data and illustrates that the differences in ΔΔCt values between the AD and UN RNA populations for each gene are consistent with the expression changes determined by array analysis.

The depression was still present after a 10-min washout, but not after a 25-min washout (Fig. 2A). Figure 2B illustrates that the differences between Asc-08007-1-1 and the T- and S-DHPG can be demonstrated within the same cell.

Plotting phenology (as number of individuals in the 5th instar) on a physiological timescale (degree days) illustrates that the differences in juvenile development times between Willamette Valley and Cascades populations are conserved (Fig. 2A), and not simply related to differences in the temperature regime in relation to calendar time that a population experiences.

The results illustrated that the difference on optical efficiency of the simulation and experimental outcome during the test is small, and maximum of it is only approximately 5%.

Overall, the results illustrated that the difference in the 14-day RIE among the trial aggregates was fairly insignificant as compared to that at the immersion age of 98 days.

It was then determined that the test statistic W ≈ F = 1.17 > 1.12, illustrating that the difference is significant at the 5% level (p-value = 0.02).

Cumulative frequency distributions of interface micromotion illustrated that the differences between specimens were greater than the variations in micromotion within a particular specimen.

These results illustrate that the differences in the TEQ explain the differences in the strict dioxin-like effects (EROD, MROD induction), but the non-dioxin-like congeners cause other effects that are not associated with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (e.g., PROD).