In Fig. 4, the curves illustrate bias at levels of μ ERS = 1,.5, 0, −.5, and −1, respectively.
The examples in Figure 4 will illustrate bias analyses of dopamine D2 receptor signaling using model B 12 a and experimental results from our laboratory.
Figure 1 illustrates the bias in measured activity concentrations in grey matter regions of the Hoffman phantom for IDM with varying number of iterations and for both high- and low-statistics data (frame durations).
A student writing a research paper illustrates confirmation bias when he only references resources in line with his thesis, and he excludes any contradictory evidence.
Figure 1 illustrates the bias at each grid point.
The heat map shown in Figure 5 clearly illustrates a bias in biological processes that exhibit significant probabilities.
Despite the accessibility of plants in promoting education in the sciences, research on curriculum and cognition clearly illustrates considerable bias by students and faculty in favor of their mobile, heterotrophic counterparts.
An extreme example is the gene encoding the highly abundant α-tubulin gene in L. major which uses only 40 of the 61 available codons. Figure 1 illustrates this bias across all synonymous codons for T. brucei and L. major.
Figure 5 illustrates the bias incurred when estimating h, and also points to an asymmetry in the sense that within the range -1 ≤ h ≤ 1 studies where D < 0 could perhaps be included without the bias being too serious (note, however, that in some cases h changes sign), but when D > 0 occurs we may not capture the true direction of dominance.
Figure 3 A illustrates these biases for a representative subject, from whom the data were acquired from the right dorsal V1, representing the left lower visual field in the parafoveal region (2 9° eccentricity).
A 2009 study commissioned by the Ministry of Family illustrated this bias.
