To illustrate: the statement "the cause of malaria is the bite of a mosquito" is a relative presupposition.
We point out that the mentioned conditions appear to be difficult to be checked as they involve the geometry of the set C. We illustrate the statement of our results with a brief example.
These observations illustrate the statement by Moore and colleagues that 'IL-10 can effect very different outcomes depending on timing, dose, and location of expression.
We illustrate the statements of part 1) and 2) of proposition 2 in Fig. 2, where in the vertical axes we plot the values of all individuals' levels of training [ t i (q*)] as a function of their natural ability (q).
Proof Same as proof of Lemma 2. □. Figure 4 illustrates the statement of Lemma 4 by showing the graph of M ε, as a function of ε, for τ = 1 / 2, I ( t ) = 1.25 t e − t.
This implies M ε → q as ε → 0. Part (b) of Lemma 1, combined with (22), implies M ε → 0 as ε → ∞. □. Figure 3 illustrates the statement of Lemma 2 by showing the graph of M ε, as a function of ε, for τ = 10, I ( t ) = 1.25 t e − t.
According to the example 7, the texts t4, t5 are in D 16,1,ACA)· B a c k(H∗ ACA,TA)), that illustrates the statement (14) of the theorem.
In order to illustrate the mentioned statement, we assume a 16×16 matrix F. We also define a matrix F ′ with entries that are the odd entries of F. Down-sampling F ′ by a factor of k=2, we can obtain F ″, and up-sampling F ″ by a factor of k=2 leads us to F up ″.
To illustrate the latter statement, we performed Monte-Carlo simulations of the LSS data and their fit.
We illustrate the above statements in the example of the gelsolin protein – an actin-binding protein regulating actin filament assembly – of PDB ID 1d0n.
