Exact(5)
The model accounts for psychophysical aspects of dynamic tactile perception and predicts illusory phenomena in the tactile domain, analogous to the barber-pole effect.
Gilhodes and colleagues suggested that illusory phenomena might cause some muscle activity, rather than be its consequence.
Indeed, it may be hypothesized that both illusory phenomena are subtended similarly at low hierarchical levels whereas audio-visual integration of speech elements requires supplementary processing.
The most likely explanation of this is that the collinearity of stimulated sites is more important than the collinearity of the expected trajectory of the illusory mislocalization, i.e. the posture of the stimulated sites are more important to determining whether or not illusory phenomena will influence the perception than the posture/position of the unstimulated (expected illusory) site.
Important information on audio-visual integration is provided by illusory phenomena.
Similar(55)
Motion-induced blindness (MIB) is an illusory phenomenon, in which a static target surrounded by moving distracters is perceived to disappear.
The results from the current study follow a similar pattern – behaviour related to the illusory phenomenon seems to echo known temporal rules for multisensory integration in the SC, but not spatial rules.
Apart from the illusory phenomenon per se, their unstability and sensitivity to subtle stimulus properties can be employed for examining more general questions that may be difficult to address with normal stimuli.
Though evidence exists that the perceptual basis for the CRE is found in unimodal tactile maps located in area 3b of somatosensory cortex [1], the evidence here suggests that the perception of this illusory phenomenon must include information from cortical areas that receive significant postural or proprioceptive input.
The illusory change phenomenon can be understood based on change detection at the attribute-pair level.
It appears that all human behaviour and experience (normal as well as abnormal) is well attended by illusory and hallucinatory phenomena.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com