Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The mean CGI-S score was 6.4 (SD = 0.5) at the beginning of the study (all participants were severely ill, scoring 6 or 7 on the CGI-S).
Similar(59)
Patients CFS scores were divided into very fit-managing well (score 1 3), vulnerable (score of 4) and mildly frail-terminally ill (score 5 9), n = 784.
APACHE II: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Scores BMII: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; CRP: C-reactive protein; EN: enteral nutrition; IL-6: interleukin-6; IQR: interquartile range; MV: mechanical ventilation; NUTRIC: Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill Score; PCT: procalcitonin; PN: parenteral nutrition; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.
Obviously a more accurate assessment of the magnitude of the nutrition risk by scores such as the Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score [ 1] will help to solve these issues.
The score items have face validity and modest overlap with severity of illness scores for critically ill children in ICUs and emergency departments [ 13- 17].
40 In the derivation populations the nurse scored ill appearance on a 2 point scale: ill versus non-ill appearance.
This is particularly important for the less severely ill patients (SOFA score ≤ 6), since this group represents either the earliest presentation in the clinical course of sepsis and/or the less severe form of this disease.
By using the term "Obamacare," the president effectively neutralized the GOP's ill intent and scored some points.
One hundred and sixty-four out of 196 severely ill patients (SOFA score > 10) had sepsis.
Imipenem/cilastatin was more frequently administered than pip/taz in seriously ill patients (SOFA score 6 ± 4 vs 9 ± 3, P = 0.005), and in the case of prior broad-spectrum IA therapy between S0 and reoperation (87% for imipenem vs 65% for pip/taz; P = 0.04).
3. Participants must be severely ill (CGI Scale score 6 or higher).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com