Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
To test for statistically significant differences in the total number of days absent or ill data were analysed using multivariate tests.
For those who delivered by CS and those who were severely ill, data collection was done when they were fully awake and able to respond adequately to the questions.
An initial evaluation of the measurement model that comprised 22 items indicated the necessity of dropping 2 items when running it with the Ill data sample and 3 items when running it with the Well data sample, because of unsatisfactory significance and loading values of these items.
Across all countries and settings for children with RVGE, the mean number ± standard deviation (SD) of nappies used per day ranged from between 4.22 ± 1.67 (hospital, Germany) and 5.65 ± 2.96 (hospital, Spain) when the child was healthy, to between 8.76 ± 1.95 (primary care, France) and 12.77 ± 4.72 (hospital, Spain) while the child was ill (data not shown).
Similar(56)
Intensive insulin therapy to maintain serum glucose levels between 80 and 110 mg/dL has previously been shown to reduce mortality in the critically ill; recent data, however, have called this benefit into question.
For critically ill patients, data concerning preventive treatment are scarce and inconsistent [ 7, 9- 11].
In the critically ill, however, data relating intragastric pH and pulmonary infections are inconsistent.
In contrast, significantly lower RANTES CSF levels were evident in severely and critically ill cases (data not shown).
For instance, in critically ill patients, data come from different ICUs and because observations are clustered into groups (or units), the observed outcomes cannot be considered as independent.
Due to the skewed distribution of most of the parameters in critically ill patients, data are given as median and range.
In spite of the evidence for the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients, data indicate an under-use of thromboprophylaxis in these patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com