Sentence examples for ii choice of from inspiring English sources

The salient features of this design are: (i) it uses auxiliary parallelograms to locate the center of mass of each leg at the base, (ii) choice of geometric and inertial parameters to satisfy the reactionless conditions and/or selection of trajectory to achieve a reactionless design.

The design of such reactors relies on 3 choices: i) choice of a suitable resonant mode (i.e. with an electric field structure conducive to plasma ignition), ii) choice of a MW coupling system to excite the cavity, and iii) choice of a quartz window to delimit a reduced pressure zone inside the cavity, so as to obtain the plasma in front of the substrate [1].

The approach followed in this paper is based on (i) choice of methods and technologies for data collection, (ii) choice of solution algorithms for solving the vehicle routing problem described in the previous section, (iii) computation of the added value generated by data reliability in combination with the chosen solution algorithms.

Model building was performed in four different steps: (i) selection of the structural model (one, two or three compartment model), (ii) choice of a statistical sub-model, (iii) covariate analysis, and (iv) model evaluation.

(ii) Choice of the step size.  .

This has been demonstrated for two cases (i) periodically distributed system and (ii) constant choice of system parameters.

Assessing biodiversity from field-based data is difficult for a number of practical reasons: (i) establishing the total number of sampling units to be investigated and the sampling design (e.g. systematic, random, stratified) can be difficult; (ii) the choice of the sampling design can affect the results; and (iii) defining the focal population of interest can be challenging.

This study examines the sensitivity of vegetation model simulations to: (i) the selection of input climatologies representing different time periods and their associated atmospheric CO2 concentrations, (ii) the choice of observed vegetation data for evaluating the model results, and (iii) the methods used to compare simulated and observed vegetation.

These two topics are: (i) the physics and chemistry of the interaction of light with semiconductor particles, in particular pyrite and (ii) the choice of progress variable in experimental studies of pyrite oxidation.

[23], with some modifications, namely: (i) the method for calibration of algorithm parameters; (ii) the choice of the image set; (iii) the use of a web-based polling application; and (iv) the choice of algorithms (FDoG, DoG, Canny and the approach proposed).

This test has the following attractive characteristics: (i) it does not restrict the autoregressive parameter to be homogeneous across (i) under the alternative of stationarity; and (ii) the choice of the lag length and the inclusion of a time trend in the individual ADF regressions can be determined separately for each region.