Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "ignorant for" is not correct or commonly used in written English.
It is possible that you have encountered it in spoken language, but it is not considered to be a grammatically correct phrase. A more standard way to express the same idea would be to use "ignorant of" or "ignorant about". For example: - She was ignorant of the laws regarding speeding. - He was ignorant about the history of the city. Alternatively, you could use "ignorant that" to indicate what someone is unaware of. For example: - The politician was ignorant that his microphone was still on. However, if you were determined to use the phrase "ignorant for", you could potentially use it in a sentence like this: - His constant interruptions showed that he was ignorant for proper meeting etiquette.
Exact(29)
"I think we've left people ignorant for a long time".
Some called the actors "ignorant" for not understanding limits on the government's ability to affect another country's judicial process.
And listen to others, even to the dull and the ignorant, for they too have their story.
People often blame their superiors for being ignorant, for showing favoritism, for being sexist, racist, or classist.
They also know they are considered by many to be superstitious or ignorant for adhering to their beliefs.
"It seem like some people believe that, just because I ain't got no education, say I must be too ignorant for art," he once said.
Similar(31)
Among her writings are "books and articles for the interested ignorant — 'Astronomy for the Young,'Eclipseses for Everyone' " — and she has unusual ambition for a woman of her day.
end{aligned} (1) where S is for ignorants, I for spreaders, and R for stiflers.
If the majority consists of the willfully ignorant--for false information and biased and subjective knowledge amounts to the same thing as ignorance--then the exercise of that authority has a good chance to be bad.
Figure 3 Comparison of exit aggregate for infected and ignorant simulations for motorway velocities.
Those who do not concur form part, for Ford, of "an ignorant population"; for Stokes those who "demonise" fail to see asylum seekers "in their full humanity".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com