Yet, conservatives continue to march out parades of white men to spout aggressively ignorant arguments that alienate even audiences inclined to be sympathetic to their point of view.
(In fact, he seems to have gotten his ignorant arguments confused — his metaphor about a hurricane creating a 747 in a junkyard is often used to deride evolution, to which it is equally inapplicable).
(In fact, he seems to have gotten his ignorant arguments confused his metaphor about a hurricane creating a 747 in a junkyard is often used to deride evolution, to which it is equally inapplicable).
The most ignorant arguments are black-and-white, and it's clear from interviewing subject-matter experts that there is no consensus on the future outcomes, economically or technologically.
Soufan provides the evidence of just how ignorant this argument is.
Instead we need to deconstruct his ignorant, oppressive argument and reveal it for what it really is: in the apt words of another journalist, nothing but a "turd tornado".
In a way, LBS exemplifies the European elite in this crisis: moralizing, sententious, always wrong yet always convinced that the other side of the argument is ignorant and unwashed.
I would be remiss if I didn't make clear that the just adopt argument is ignorant, plain and simple.
In the case of then Prime Minister Tony Blair and his foreign secretary Jack Straw, she said that even if they remained ignorant, "there is an argument that they should have known, and that… they are ultimately responsible for ensuring that all agents of the British state uphold domestic and international law, which prohibits torture in all circumstances".
There's no way you can win an argument with an ignorant person.
