Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
If we interchange the order of summation, we reach (61).
Now if we interchange with in the last equation, we get (2.7).
If we interchange X by PX in (i) we get (ii) by using Theorem 2.1 and Lemma 3.1(i).
Also, if we interchange Z by PZ in (22), then we have (g(A_{FPZ}{X}, Y)=0), i.e., (A_{FPZ}{X}) also has no components (TM_T).
Similar(56)
We interchanged the positions of higher and lower quality feeders in the experimental array daily.
b Suppose that and is contractive for all with commuting on and being contractive The proof now follows if we mutually interchange in (a) above.
We interchange.
Then using Lemma 3, we interchange modulo operations.
We may interchange ''time" and ''frequency" and repeat these remarks.
We can interchange the role of input and impulse response.
Suppose we now interchange the parts of P and Q.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com