if we included

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "if we included" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing hypothetical situations or considering the implications of including something in a discussion or analysis. Example: "If we included the latest data in our report, our conclusions would be more robust."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Lillian was adamant that she would only do it if we included boys and as usual, she was amazingly ahead of her time," Mr. Hochberg said.

The New York Times

"Last year, [with] women alone the figure was 2,800 turned away and we could probably easily double that if not triple that if we included children," former head of the NSW Women's Refuge Movement Catherine Gander said in September.

The Guardian

So many studies come up with scary "statistics" about children not reading as much as they used to but if we included reading online and on social network sites in those statistics, the figures would be much more positive.

The Guardian

If we included these other violent events in the hearings, we'd be sending the false signal that we think there's a security threat equivalency between Al Qaeda and the neo-Nazi movement, or Al Qaeda and gun groups.

The New York Times

They gross about $30,000 to $40,000 a year, "enough to pay for labor and inputs," said Mr. Hazlehurst, "but if we included our own time and capital, it's not profitable".

The New York Times

The education secretary also claimed that the extent to which [the history curriculum] was "exclusively British has been overstated", telling the MPs: "If we included the history of every civilisation from the dawn of time until now, there wouldn't be any time for anything else".

The Guardian

Axelrod says, "We didn't put the payroll-tax cut into our speeches in the fall because we didn't think we could pass it, and we worried that if we included it in our rhetoric it might pollute the issue and impair our chances of getting it done after the election".

The New Yorker

Results were parallel if we included only saplings <50 mm dbh.

Forest Ecosystems

The operative definition if we included these texts would, of course, change.

SEP

"If we included these, our overall percentage would probably be close to 50%," the company says.

Forbes

The list could look very different if we included properties that didn't close this year.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "if we included", ensure the context clearly outlines what the inclusion refers to, avoiding ambiguity for the reader. For example, specify "If we included the cost of labor..." rather than simply "If we included...".

Common error

Avoid using "if we included" without explicitly stating what 'we' refers to. Unclear references can confuse the reader about who is performing the inclusion or analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "if we included" functions as a conditional clause that introduces a hypothetical scenario. It sets up a condition where adding something would have a certain consequence. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage is correct and widespread.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "if we included" is a grammatically sound and frequently used conditional phrase, as validated by Ludwig AI. It serves to introduce hypothetical scenarios, primarily within analytical contexts in scientific and news-related domains. Best practices involve ensuring clarity regarding what is being included, and by whom, to avoid ambiguity. Related alternatives, such as "had we included", offer nuanced ways to express similar conditions. The phrase exhibits a neutral to formal register, making it suitable for a wide range of written communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had we included

Inverts the standard conditional structure for emphasis.

assuming we included

Emphasizes the assumption of inclusion as a condition.

in the event we included

Formalizes the conditional statement to refer to a possible event.

supposing we included

Presents the inclusion as a hypothetical scenario.

on the condition that we included

Highlights the inclusion as a prerequisite.

if we were to include

Adds a layer of hypotheticality or speculation.

should we include

Uses an interrogative form to express conditionality.

considering we included

Frames the inclusion as a factor under consideration.

taking into account if we included

Emphasizes a more comprehensive evaluation of the condition.

assuming the inclusion of

Shifts the focus to the inclusion itself as the key factor.

FAQs

How can I use "if we included" in a sentence?

You can use "if we included" to introduce a hypothetical scenario where something is added or taken into consideration. For instance, "If we included the missing data, the results would be different."

What are some alternatives to "if we included"?

Alternatives include phrases like "had we included", "assuming we included", or "supposing we included", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "if we included" or "if we had included"?

The choice between "if we included" and "if we had included" depends on the timeframe. "If we included" refers to a present or future possibility, while "if we had included" refers to a past hypothetical situation.

What is the difference between "if we included" and "if we incorporate"?

"If we included" suggests adding something to an existing set, while "if we "incorporate"" implies integrating it more fundamentally into the whole. The choice depends on the degree of integration you're describing.