Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(16)
However, if we classify gamblers according to quantitative measures alone, we miss the reason why different groups behave differently.
However, if we classify individuals solely on the basis of their educational attainment, we obtain strikingly different results.
Moreover, if we classify kidneys on the basis of actual causal powers, we include Swampman's kidney-analog at the cost of excluding many real kidneys, such as the kidneys of people on dialysis.
However, if we classify the individuals according to the number of days in which they used the car, the TTE distributions differ when we consider small T values (see Figure 3(d)).
Interestingly, if we classify those students who scored in the "moderate acceptance" range as not accepting evolution, Professors Orville and Jones overestimate their students' level of acceptance, and Ronson is even more inaccurate.
However, there are interesting patterns if we classify windows on significance of (fig. 7).
Similar(44)
If we classified HOMA-IR based on its tertile, the incidence rate ratios of tertile 3 for subgroups with HbA1c ≤8%, HbA1c >8%, blood pressure ≤130/8 0mmHg, and blood pressure >130/8 0mmHg were all significant as compared with those in tertile 1.
Even if we classified as similar 1 case pair with only 2 loci differences according to VNTR (no RFLP type available: patient 4 in the Table), i.e., if we assumed that this difference was caused by evolution of the VNTR pattern or a processing error, the proportion of infections acquired outside the household still would be 77% (10/13).
As previously said, among the symptoms described in Section 3, we classify if a user will present at least one instance of fever, sore throat, cough, shortness of breath, headache, muscle pain, malaise, or cold.
For a constant c, if FDM > c, we classify the gene as positive.
We classify them differently if they are noise or ROIs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com