Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
If this text is to survive another 200 years it needs to modernise and reflect today's realities.
If this text is bringing pleasure to people who wouldn't usually access pornographic material to enrich their sex lives, then all the better.
In Paris, Mr. de Villepin said, "Even if this text does not go as far as we would like, we have decided to vote for this resolution".
I am basing these judgments on the English edition, but, if this text was the product of extensive editing, what must the unedited version have looked like?
Still, the theory is genuinely Wyclif's, even if this text is not.
Question: how comfortable would you feel right now if this text linked to a broken page on your site?
Similar(51)
If you had only this text, and if you were 4 or 5 years old, you might be thinking that this is all lovely enough, and may I please have a story now?
But what, if anything, does this text have to offer people who are not Philip K Dick?
If I received this text just a year ago, I'd be demanding more information like, what the fuck?
"If the author of this text was born in America, I would be very much interested to hear his/her defense of 'had had', except in the subjunctive.
In this text, if we take the noun term only we cannot figure out its context properly.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com