Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(31)
The condition of Proposition 1 does not hold if the conditional and marginal parameters ψ j and ψ ~ j are not distinct (i.e. if their joint parameter space is not the product of their separate parameter spaces), and in particular if the combined dimension of ψ j and ψ ~ j is greater than that of θ.
If the conditional probability of an up move rises relative to its unconditional probability, then we have momentum upwards.
Thus even if the conditional (1.3″) is true, it does not support the consequent that "good" does not mean "what we desire to desire".
If (the conditional is a requirement here) it does, that day will put an end to one of the most infamous cases of vaporware ever.
However, if the conditional expectation is correctly specified, both weighted and unweighted estimators are consistent, but the unweighted one is also more efficient (see, Wooldridge 2010).
If the conditional probability falls after such an up move then one has mean reversion upwards while if it rises then there is momentum upwards.
Similar(29)
The romance is filmed as if in the conditional tense, fusing its fantasy with a clear-eyed view of its recklessly dangerous impracticality.
And classically this will be the case if and only if the context supports the conditional "if Geraldine is a mormon, then she has had holy underwear that she wore".
If R&B, the conditional gets semantic value 1, if R&~B, it gets semantic value 0. What does it get if ~R?
We pause to mention DLiar as it is connected with another important paradox: Curry's paradox, which involves conditionals that say of themselves only that if they (the conditional itself) are true, so too is some absurdity (e.g., 'if this sentence is true, then 1=0' or 'if this sentence is true, everything is true' or so on).
If then the conditional univariate distributions for arm i given the previous 1,.... (i-1) arms are: Different values for the powers p 1 and p 2 of the fractional polynomials correspond to different models.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com