Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
But what if one held that the smallest parts of time are finite if tiny so that a moving arrow might actually move some distance during an instant?
Such would be the case, for example, if one held that there are (or can be) differences in the phenomenal character of different sensory modalities (e.g., visual and tactile) even where they have just the same representational content.
This would follow only if one held that a condition of an entity's status as an individual human being is that it be impossible for it to cease to exist by dividing into two or more entities.
Similar(57)
If one holds that view, the question of whether drones are a morally permissible weapon is a moot point: on this view, no weapon should ever be used to kill another human being.
So, if one holds that sets or propositions have no qualitative features, then World Indiscernibility is true, regardless of one's views about what is and what is not possible.
The arbitrariness objection has less force if one holds that, say, only moral obligations are to be accounted for by theological voluntarism.
But then, why reduce mass expressions to plural reference if one holds that water or a water plurality is something over and above those water molecules, yet denies that the lion plurality is something over and above those lions?
And if one holds that one of the crucial features of logically valid inferences is that they preserve truth then one could argue that the logical laws are norms that apply to those who have beliefs.
If one is externalist about experiential content, and if one holds that the content and the phenomenology of an experience co-vary, then one must also be an externalist about phenomenology.
Doubt about the metaphysical warrant may not doom Mencius's response to Mohism, however, if one holds that all normative theories ultimately depend on intuitive judgments and if one has no good reason to be skeptical about these judgments.
Suppose that one is in a space-time with closed time-like lines, such that certain counterfactual distributions of matter on some neighborhood of a point p are ruled out if one holds that space-time structure fixed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com