"ideological environment" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe the prevailing beliefs, values, and attitudes within a certain society or group. Here is an example of how it could be used in a sentence: "The political upheaval of the 1960s created a highly charged ideological environment, with the clash between conservative and progressive ideologies at the forefront."
This changing ideological environment is another of the "circumstances" shaping the Democratic contest.
This influence is channeled through campaign donations and also through charitable giving, particularly to nonprofits devoted to shaping the ideological environment.
In this new economic, political and ideological environment, "The Case for Big Government" shows how yesterday's contrarianism can become today's consensus.
The first number — income — includes federal money, taxes, fees, lottery proceeds and so on and can't, in the current ideological environment, include anything that could be characterized as new taxes.
It's almost like the ideological environment is like a rainforest, or a coral reef.
We believe they are particularly inflammatory within the context of today's vitriolic political and ideological environment.
Moreover, as Jones points out, in socialist countries "the significance of the state goes well beyond its status as an employer, for the state shapes the general environment in which all occupations operate," including political and ideological environments, education, and all other aspects of professional work (Jones 1991, ix).
Therefore, the finding that Indigenous self-identification carries an earnings penalty and that the penalty is higher if the individual is also capable of speaking an Indigenous language is at odds with the ideological and legal environment of Mexico.
Instead, what is needed is for researchers, analysts, and historians to write on the history of the decision-making in the build-up to the war, the invasion itself, and subsequent events in the post-Saddam environment, without ideological prejudice.
Their institutional destination is mostly determined by the ideological climate and policy environment of the time.
The close vote should not be interpreted as a sign of deep ideological division on the environment -- though some differences certainly remain -- but a victory for the public interest in passing strong global warming legislation over the self-interest of protecting an inflexible seniority system for key congressional posts.
