Sentence examples for identify science from inspiring English sources

To test this notion, Sumida developed a checklist to help identify science giftedness among Japanese students.

What are some limitations for using a tool developed in a different cultural context to identify science giftedness in the context of the Philippines?   3.

What are some limitations for using a tool developed in a different cultural context to identify science giftedness in the context of the Philippines?

This study suggests that tools used to identify science giftedness must not only be domain specific, but should also be holistic and assess other facets of giftedness.

In particular, for scientists, it provides an opportunity to work alongside emergency managers to identify science information needs and impacts of that information on decision outcomes, thresholds and trigger points.

This finding is important because it raises some important questions about how gifted students are identified based solely on examinations for admittance in school programs, the absence of checklist to nominate or to identify science gifted, and the failure of educational service to nurture and promote the factors of science giftedness.

There are several instruments published to identify science-gifted students in other countries, but it is difficult to assume the reliability and validity of these tools specifically for Filipinos' socially constructed notion of science giftedness.

In their discussion of the challenges facing gifted science education in the Philippines, Larroder and Ogawa (2015) provide some insights into the need for valid and reliable instruments that can be used to identify science-gifted students while also accounting for how giftedness is socially constructed in the Philippines.

Currently, there are several instruments available to identify science-gifted students in other countries, but these tools have not been validated for use in the Filipino education system where the socially constructed notion of science giftedness may differ from the context in which the tools were originally developed.

Rather than identifying "Science Kardashians"—those who are, as Hall put it, "famous for being famous"—the top 50 list reveals that a majority of the science Twitter stars spend much, if not all, of their time on science communication.

Indeed, this is the only way of efficiently identifying science operations planning issues and their solutions as well as of keeping track of them in order to apply them to new missions.