Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
In the next step, the average MD based on the abnormal observations obtained with the prime set of subcriteria identified was compared to that gained from all the subcriteria originally used.
Even higher differences were found when the number of proteins identified was compared to those predicted from genomes.
When the similarity of all OTUs identified was compared, there were no relevant differences between results generated by PCR at the different annealing temperatures assayed (CA a)).
The number of patients identified was compared to the number of patients younger than 18 years registered in the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) with the diagnosis code 'E83.3 Disorders of phosphorus metabolism and phosphatases' in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases version 10 (WHO ICD-10).
Similar(56)
Crystalline phases identified were compared with the reference data from International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD) files.
Since grapevines are cultivated throughout the world and commonly harbor HpSVd, sequence diversity of the HpSVd-grapevine isolates identified were compared against variants deposited in the subviral RNA database (SubViral RNA data base, [49]).
Proteins identified were compared to published databases of proteins identified from CSF and plasma.
The genotypes identified were compared with the isolates in the Brucella2012 MLVA database [ 30].
The results in terms of sources identified were compared using six and then three and two LIRs successively for each child.
Variants identified were compared with those reported in the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (dbSNP) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/).nih.gov/projects/SNP/
All 45 complexes identified were compared with known complexes in MIPS [ 58]. 25% of these complexes were partially correlated with complexes deposited in MIPS.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com