Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Notably, we found that more than 97% of the sequence reads were mapped at least once onto genomic objects identified via the automated annotation Microscope pipeline.
The micromorphology and the distribution of as-prepared samples were identified via X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and element mapping spectra.
No particles were identified by phase microscope, light microscope, or Wright stain smear.
METHOD: Four questions were identified via premeeting teleconferences.
Adult animals were identified via weight measurement.
Cells were identified via GFP expression under epifluorescence microscopy and subsequently visualized using a 40×, 0.8 NA water-immersion objective (Olympus, Center Valley, PA, United States) on an Olympus BX-61 upright microscope equipped with infrared differential interference contrast optics.
Five studies were identified via citation search.
Problems can be identified via different pathways.
Practices will be identified via the Midlands Research Practices Consortium Mid ReC).
Additional participants were identified via snowball sampling.
Patients were identified via the cancer registry.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com