Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
References of all identified trials were also inspected for more studies.
A systematic review first identified trials on head-louse infestation; 49 were selected and their methodological constraints assessed.
This paper reviews recent published trials using this method and describes the reasons authors gave for using the method, examines the crossover rates, and looks at the quality of identified trials.
Furthermore, all references lists in identified trials were scrutinized for studies not indexed in the electronic databases.
Mean RTs for correctly identified trials for each participant were entered into a 2 (training: weapon or ball; between-subjects) × 2 (search: weapon or ball; between-subjects) × 3 (change: agent, object, or environment) ANOVA.
Due to the small number of studies identified, trials were not excluded based on quality assessment and sensitivity analysis was not performed.
Further trials were identified by hand searching the reference lists of identified trials and review articles, relevant NICE guidelines and Health Technology Assessment reports.
Two of the nine identified trials were excluded because comparators other than universal ganciclovir were used in one trial each: one with medium-dose acyclovir [12] and the other with pre-emptive approach [9].
The two identified trials involved 573 women.
Figure 1 shows how we identified trials.
We identified trials in the German general health care literature.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com