Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

identified to change

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identified to change" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an attempt to convey a meaning related to recognizing something that is subject to change, but the construction is awkward and unclear. Example: "The variables in the experiment were identified to change over time, affecting the results."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

These types of putative gene clusters have also been identified to change in expression under subzero growth in E. sibiricum (Rodrigues et al., 2008) and P. arcticus (Ayala-del-Río et al., 2010) and together represent novel cryophilic gene targets worthy of further investigation.

Science & Research

Nature

The amino acid substitutions that were experimentally identified to change the binding strength to either avian or human receptor, especially the receptor preference were regarded as critical mutations.

Science

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

It is interesting that all missense mutations identified to date change cysteines in the protein.

Science

Plosone

A multifaceted intervention has been tailored to address identified barriers to change.

"There was a two-year period when we won a lot and it's hard to identify what to change when you are winning," said Kerrison.

There is no standard approach to identifying barriers to change.

The methods used to identify barriers to change have varied.

We used a simpler approach to identifying barriers to change.

A simple approach to identifying barriers to change appears to have been adequate and efficient.

It was their responsibility to identify strategies to change their behaviour.

The silos that exist between organisations were also identified as barriers to change.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Opt for clearer and more direct phrasing, such as "found to be changing" or "recognized for modification", to improve readability and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using the passive construction "identified to change" as it is grammatically unconventional. Choose active voice constructions or alternative passive formulations for clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified to change" attempts to link the act of recognition with a state of flux. However, its grammatical structure is unconventional and doesn't align with standard English usage. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is awkward and unclear.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identified to change" is a grammatically awkward construction that attempts to convey the recognition of something undergoing transformation. Ludwig AI confirms its non-standard usage. While examples can be found in both scientific and news-related contexts, it's advisable to opt for clearer and more conventional phrasing such as "found to be changing" or "recognized for modification" to ensure effective communication. Given its rarity and grammatical issues, careful consideration should be given before employing this phrase in writing.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "identified to change" for better clarity?

Consider using phrases like "found to be changing", "recognized for modification", or "determined to be altered" to enhance clarity and grammatical correctness.

Is "identified to change" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "identified to change" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It is better to use alternative phrasing that is more conventional and clear, as Ludwig AI suggests.

What's the difference between "identified to change" and "found to be changing"?

"Identified to change" is an awkward construction. In contrast, "found to be changing" is a more natural and grammatically correct way to express that something has been discovered to be in the process of change.

In what contexts should I avoid using "identified to change"?

It's best to avoid using "identified to change" in formal writing or professional communication. Opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives in academic papers, reports, or business correspondence. Ludwig AI highlights its awkwardness.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: