Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

identified to be

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identified to be" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that has been described in a certain way. For example: "The suspect was identified to be in his early fifties."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The issue was identified to be related to how the equipment was configured.

The crystal structure was identified to be the triclinic form.

Science

Polymer

The larger crystallite is identified to be a TiO2 NP.

ZrC and SiC were identified to be the main constituents.

Corresponding reaction products were identified to be Ni2Si and graphite.

This was identified to be complement C3 protein.

Iron was identified to be limiting in the culture medium.

The step fluctuations are identified to be governed by the attachment/detachment limited kinetics.

The corrosion surface films were identified to be Mg(OH 2 and MgO.

Furthermore, thereby the outstanding issues are identified to be addressed to benefit and promote practical applications.

Crack closure has been identified to be one of the main interaction effects.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identified to be", ensure that the context clearly indicates who or what is doing the identifying. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

While "identified to be" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing seem less direct and engaging. Consider rephrasing sentences to use active voice where appropriate for a more impactful message.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified to be" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been recognized or determined to possess a certain quality or characteristic. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

86%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identified to be" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in various writing contexts. It serves the purpose of indicating that something has been recognized or determined to have a particular quality, often based on analysis or investigation. While most prevalent in science and formal writing, it can also be used in media and other contexts, all of this ensures that clarity and precision are important. Be mindful of potential overuse of the passive voice and consider active alternatives when appropriate. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "identified to be" to enhance the clarity and professionalism of your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "identified to be" in a sentence?

You can use "identified to be" to indicate that something has been recognized or determined to have a particular quality or characteristic. For example, "The problem was identified to be a software glitch."

What are some alternatives to "identified to be"?

Some alternatives include "determined to be", "found to be", or "recognized as". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "identified as" or "identified to be"?

Both "identified as" and "identified to be" are correct, but they have slightly different connotations. "Identified as" directly states the identification, while "identified to be" suggests a process of identification leading to a conclusion.

Can "identified to be" be used in both formal and informal writing?

While generally suitable for formal writing, "identified to be" can also be used in informal contexts where a slightly more sophisticated tone is desired. Consider the audience and purpose of your writing when making your choice.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: