Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
Within the published data, we identified reports of missense mutations in the CT-X antigen genes MAGEA1, MAGEA4, MAGEC1, MAGEC2, as well as the genes for the ubiquitously expressed MAGEE1 (also encoded on the X chromosome) in breast and brain tumors [17], [18].
We systematically identified reports of studies assessing the use of inflammation-based scores.
We also identified reports of RCTs from the cited references of 49 pediatric CAM systematic reviews.
Database searches identified reports of intervention trials meeting the inclusion criteria.
We identified reports of any kind of clinical study published in any language that contained information about mortality with upper gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation.
Out of a total of 104 identified reports of adverse drug reactions considered as suitable for further analysis, 35 reports (34%) contained information indicative of label-inconsistent use.
Similar(50)
A literature search was performed using PubMed to identify reports of allergy associated with the sources of the three transgenes.
Background: In view of the continued increase in the number of hadron (i.e. neutron, proton and light or heavy ion) therapy (HT) centres we performed a systematic literature review to identify reports of the efficacy of HT.
Methods: We used word frequency analysis to develop a search strategy of known sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) to identify reports of controlled evaluation studies of road safety interventions in the TRANSPORT database.
This article reviews the available evidence and guidance on methods to identify reports of quasi-experimental (QE) studies to inform systematic reviews of health care, public health, international development, education, crime and justice, and social welfare.
The optimal search strategy for specifically identifying reports of adverse effects has yet to be established.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com