identified in all

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identified in all" is not standard and may be confusing in written English.
It could be used in contexts where you want to emphasize that something has been recognized or acknowledged universally or in every instance. Example: "The issues identified in all reports must be addressed promptly to ensure consistency across the board."

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The precipitates were identified in all of the alloy specimens.

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

NANDA's body image disturbance diagnosis was identified in all patients.

Burns

A total of 13 aldehydes were identified in all CCAs.

Natural Products and Bioprospecting

Triggers could be identified in all the 186 subjects (100%).

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Individual markers are then identified in all projections.

Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging

However, such content could not be identified in all languages.

International Journal of STEM Education

Pb was identified in all vegetables from all areas.

Chemistry Central Journal

The purity of hydrothermally synthesized SAPO-5 was identified in all solids.

Catalysis Today

Reversible processes, and, were identified in all the solvents under investigations.

Electrochimica Acta

The presence of two porosity domains was identified in all the carbon materials.

Carbon

Nine TAG molecular species were identified in all the coffee samples.

Journal of Stored Products Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identified in all", ensure the context clearly indicates what was identified and the scope of "all". Avoid redundancy by rephrasing if the "all" is already implied. For example, instead of "The gene was identified in all samples analyzed" consider, "The gene was identified in all analyzed samples."

Common error

Avoid using "identified in all" when "identified" already implies a comprehensive assessment. For instance, saying "The problem was identified" often conveys the same meaning as "The problem was identified in all instances" without the added verbosity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified in all" functions as a descriptive element within a sentence, emphasizing that something was recognized or detected across every member of a group or every instance of a situation. Ludwig provides numerous examples primarily from scientific contexts, confirming this usage pattern.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identified in all" is commonly used, particularly in scientific writing, to emphasize that a finding or observation is universal within a specified group or set of circumstances. While Ludwig AI notes that the phrase is acceptable, it also indicates that it can sometimes be redundant. When aiming for conciseness, consider whether the "all" is already implied by the context. If so, simply "identified" may suffice. Otherwise, retain "identified in all" to stress comprehensiveness. The phrase is most suited for formal and scientific registers.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Detected across all

Focuses on detection rather than identification, implying a sensory or technological discovery.

Recognized in every instance

Emphasizes acknowledgment or awareness in each individual case.

Present in each and every one

Highlights the presence of something without necessarily implying active identification.

Found universally

Implies a widespread or global presence, shifting the emphasis from specific identification to general occurrence.

Established in all cases

Focuses on confirming or proving something to be true in every situation.

Determined across the board

Suggests a comprehensive assessment leading to a consistent finding in all instances.

Observed in all specimens

Specifically related to scientific contexts involving specimens, narrowing the application.

Demonstrated in each instance

Emphasizes the act of showing or proving something in every individual occurrence.

Discovered in every single

Highlighting that it has been found or detected, emphasizing the act of discovery.

Confirmed in each subject

Focuses on verification and validation within a study or experiment.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "identified in all" for better clarity?

Consider alternatives like "detected across all", "recognized in every instance", or "present in each and every one" depending on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it grammatically incorrect to say "identified in all"?

While not strictly grammatically incorrect, the phrase "identified in all" can sometimes sound redundant or awkward. It's often more concise and elegant to simply say "identified" when the context already implies universality.

What's the difference between "detected across all" and "identified in all"?

"Detected across all" implies a sensory or technological discovery, while "identified in all" suggests a more cognitive or analytical recognition. The best choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the process of finding or the act of understanding.

When is it appropriate to use "identified in all" instead of just "identified"?

Use "identified in all" when you want to emphasize the comprehensive nature of the identification, particularly when there's a possibility that the reader might assume it wasn't universally present. For example, to counter an argument about something being rare, you can explicitly say "identified in all".