Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Considering data analysis results, the combinations enabling an increase in R for each flour type were identified: for strong flour (RT = 45min, TG = 0.2%, VG = 1%), medium flour (RT = 45min, TG = 0.1%, VG>1%) and weak flour (RT = 45min, TG>0.2%, VG>1%).
Similar(59)
Invariants are identified for cocycle conjugacy and strong cocycle conjugacy classes.
Although no specific function has been identified for patch 239 245, its strong conservation across aRF1 and a/eDom34p (fig. 1B) suggests that this region has an important functional role.
Given the paucity of risk factors identified for infant leukaemia, the strong evidence of an in utero origin, and the potential for possible effects on the developing fetus, we examined non-prescription maternal analgesic use and the risk of infant leukaemia.
Because of the small sample, in conjunction with the relatively strong effects identified for some attributes (i.e., that produced few misclassifications), CTA models were not possible for the present sample (Yarnold and Soltysik 2016).
The strong motifs identified for this set were the CACA, the G-rich and the TGTG motifs [Additional file 10].
The strong motifs identified for the 13 sets, and the positional conservation information for the motifs, are summarized in Additional file 10.
Strong motifs identified for this group were the TGCACA motif, the G-rich motif and the TGTG motif [Additional file 10].
Importantly, we also identified for the first time a strong enrichment in epigenetic-related Gene Ontology terms such "regulation of gene expression, epigenetic" and "chromatin assembly or disassembly" (Table 2b).
Strong motifs identified for the set were the G-rich, C-rich and TGTG motifs [Additional file 10]. Figure 10 shows that G-rich motifs are quite numerous: there are 11 4G, 29 3G and 27 2G motifs.
Interestingly, the strong motifs identified for both sets of genes are the same (G-rich, C-rich and TGTG motifs); motif occurrences in the upstream regions of the 2 sets, however, show differences.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com